Court restrains BPE, others from conducting verification for ex-PHCN workers
The National Industrial Court in Ibadan on Thursday, restrained the Bureau of Public Enterprise (BPE) from conducting verification exercise for payment of 16 months severance benefits for defunct Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) workers.
Other respondents in the suit are the National Council on Privatisation (NCP), Nigeria Electricity Liability Management Company (NELMCO), National Union of Electricity Employees (NUEE) and Senior Staff Association of Electricity and Allied Company (SSAEAC).
The former PHCN workers who instituted the case on behalf of others are Gbenga Oduwole, Joseph Babatunde, Micheal Borokini, Adeniyi Siyanbola and Ajayi Olusola.
Justice Muhammed Yakubu gave the order on while ruling in an application of interlocutory injunction filed by the ex-PHCN workers’ through their Counsel, Mr Kunle Abimbola against the defendants.
Yakubu said that granting an interlocutory injunction application was at the discretion of the court and must be exercise judiciously.
He said that it was very important for the party seeking an injunction to proof to the court he would suffer more if the application was refuse.
“In this case the claimants have been able to proof to the court that they would suffer more and would not be adequately compensated if the verification exercise continue.
“The application is granted and I resolve the issue in favour of the applicants and I make no order as to cost,” the judge said.
Yakubu said that the application was meritorious and ordered all the parties to maintain status qou pending the determination of the case.
The judge ordered excellerated hearing of the suit and adjourned until Oct.25 for hearing.
The claimants, who were disengaged in Oct.31, 2013 when PHCN was privatised and unbundled into several companies instituted the case after realising that the amount they intend to pay them as their severance allowances fell short of what was agreed upon.
The claimants were of the view that the verification exercise being conducted by BPE failed to comply with the Sumonu committee report agreement.
They are urging the court to compel the defendants to pay their severance allowances in line with the agreement of the Sumonu committee report which was an embodiment of the aggregate of their benefits.
