Lawyers, journalists, others barred from Tukur Mamu’s trial
On Wednesday, granted an application by the FG to protect witnesses lined up in the prosecution of Mamu, who is being tried over his alleged relationship with terrorists that were involved in last year’s attack on a Kaduna-bound train.
Lawyers and litigants, including journalists, were ordered on Friday to vacate Courtroom 7 of the Federal High Court (FHC), Abuja, where the trial of Tukur Mamu was held.
When the matter was called, E.A. Kaswe, counsel from the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), who is prosecuting the case on the Federal Government’s behalf, told the court that their witnesses were in court for the trial.
Kaswe then urged Justice Inyang Ekwo to enforce the order granted the prosecution on Wednesday when the matter came up
“May I humbly ask the court to enforce the order granted for all parties not party to the suit to vacate the court?” he prayed.
Justuce Ekwo, who granted the prayer, ordered everyone to vacate the court, except the parties in the suit.
The development was, however, contrary to the application by the prosecution that accredited journalists at the FHC should be allowed to observe proceedings in the trial.
The trial is ongoing as at the time of filing the report
Supreme reports that Justice Ekwo had, on Wednesday, granted an application by the FG to protect witnesses lined up in the prosecution of Mamu, who is being tried over his alleged relationship with terrorists that were involved in last year’s attack on a Kaduna-bound train.
The judge granted the application following an ex-parte motion moved by Kaswe to the same effect.
Moving the ex-parte motion marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/96/2023, Kaswe said the application dated May 11 was filed on June 15.
He said the motion was brought pursuant to Section 36(4), (A), and (B) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Section 232 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015, including Sections 73(1), (2) (C), and (4) of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.
In the motion, the FG prayed for four orders.
These include “An order of this honourable Court excluding persons other than parties and their legal representatives at the hearing of the above-named charge except members of the accredited press.
“An order of this Honourable Court vacating the court room whenever the prosecution witnesses are coming to testify
“An order of this Honourable Court shielding the physical identity of the prosecution witnesses by wearing facial masks or the use of a screen whenever prosecution witnesses are testifying
“An order of this Honourable Court directing the use of pseudonyms by prosecution witnesses and deleting the real names and addresses of prosecution witnesses throughout the proceedings of this case.”
Supreme News reports that Mamu, a former terrorists’ negotiator, was arraigned on March 21 by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation on 10 counts bordering on terrorism financing, especially the recent Abuja-Kaduna train attack.
He, however, pleaded not guilty to the charges.
On April 27, the court also declined to grant him bail on grounds of ill-health.
The judge, who held that the grounds were not cogent enough to grant bail to the defendant facing terrorism-related charges, also cited Mamu’s failure to debunk the claims contained in the counter-affidavit filed to oppose his bail application by the Department of State Services (DSS), the agency keeping him in custody.
Mamu was arrested on Sept. 6, 2022, on his way to Saudi Arabia for the Lesser Hajj and was detained at Cairo International Airport before being repatriated to Nigeria.
In the charge,the Federal Government accused him of aiding and abetting Boko Haram terrorism attacks against innocent Nigerians.
He was accused of collecting various sums of money in various currencies on behalf of Boko Haram terrorists from the families of the victims of the train attack.
He was said to have collected $420, 000 from the families of the attack and another N21 million from another set of families of the train attack.
He is also accused of concealing the terrorism funds in his Kaduna residence in violation of provisions of the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act.
He denied all the charges when they were read to him.